Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02692
Original file (BC 2014 02692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02692

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry (RE) code of “6H” reflected on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

When he was discharged, he was told he could reenter after he had lost the necessary weight.  He now meets entry requirements. 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Air National Guard on 25 Mar 08.

On 7 Mar 09, the applicant was required to weigh-in prior to his attending Basic Military Training (BMT), where he was determined to be 20 pounds over the maximum allowable weight and nine percent over the maximum body mass index (BMI) standard.

On 12 Jul 09, the applicant’s commander issued him a Letter of Notification (LON) notifying him of his intent to separate him, and his right to legal counsel and to submit information on his own behalf.  The applicant did not contest this decision. 

On 24 Aug 09, the applicant’s commander recommended him for discharge for not being able to attend BMT due to his being 20 pounds over the maximum allowable weight and nine percent of the maximum body mass index (BMI) standard.  The recommended separation was determined to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged with an entry level separation.  

On 25 Oct 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service, with an  RE code of 6H, and was credited with one year, six months, and six days of total inactive service. 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  As stated in AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, membership in the Air National Guard or the Air Force Reserve (USAFR) is not an inherent right.  Further, a member should be separated while in entry level status when it is determined the member is unqualified for continued military service by reason of unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both), as evidenced by inability, lack of reasonable effort, failure to adapt to the military environment, or minor disciplinary infractions. 

The applicant was involuntary separated due to his inability to attend BMT because his weight and BMI exceeded the military standards.  ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, confirms the applicant’s RE code of “6H” makes him ineligible for reentry.   

A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of NGB/A1PP and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02692 in Executive Session on 16 Apr 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Jun 14.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, NGB/A1PP, dated 31 Jul 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jan 15.

						

Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-140

    Original file (2010-140.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The page 7 advised the applicant that she was required to lose the weight and/or body fat by July 17, 2009, and that if she failed to reach weight compliance by the end of the probationary period, she would be recommended for separation. she acknowledged with her signature: On November 2, 2009, the following page 7 was placed in the applicant’s record which On this date you have been determined to be 7 pounds over your MAW and 3% over your maximum allowable body fat. the evidence that the...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2010-140

    Original file (2010-140.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The page 7 advised the applicant that she was required to lose the weight and/or body fat by July 17, 2009, and that if she failed to reach weight compliance by the end of the probationary period, she would be recommended for separation. she acknowledged with her signature: On November 2, 2009, the following page 7 was placed in the applicant’s record which On this date you have been determined to be 7 pounds over your MAW and 3% over your maximum allowable body fat. the evidence that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01432

    Original file (BC 2014 01432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01432 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “6H” (Pending Discharge-Involuntary) on his National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be upgraded so he may reenter the Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03413

    Original file (BC-2012-03413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RE code 6H is an Air Force sanctioned and recognized code and is found in the Military Personnel Data System. This code applies to the Air National Guard and is used when a member is not selected for further retention in accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00490

    Original file (BC 2014 00490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His current RE code was based on the fact he did not have a valid Security Clearance; which caused him to not be world-wide deployable. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00592

    Original file (BC 2014 00592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 6H (Pending Discharge - Involuntary) be corrected. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant's military personnel records, he initially entered the Air National Guard on 4 Aug 11. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05889

    Original file (BC-2012-05889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 July 2013, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112

    Original file (BC 2013 01112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 – involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01614

    Original file (BC 2014 01614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “6U” (Not selected for reentry by the commander) on his National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be upgraded so he may reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01234

    Original file (BC 2013 01234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Grade Determination for Non-Prior Service (NPS) Enlistees, enlistment in the grade of E-3 is authorized when the applicant meets the following criteria: a. Presents General Billy Mitchell Award certificate showing successful completion of the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) training program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit...